Close
    Search Search

    Samsung phones are not as water resistant as it claims, regulator claims

      According to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Samsung is deceiving its smartphone users by claiming they are water resistant to the point where you can swim with them in a pool or sea. In a press release (CNET) the regulator says it will take the Korean to court over false advertising in its commercials.

      Several recently released cell phones support IP68 certification for dust and water resistance. It allows devices to be submerged in fresh water to a depth of 1,5 meters for a maximum period of 30 minutes without damage to the device.



      However, according to the ACCC, Samsung extrapolated the certification's capabilities in its commercials in the media, saying that its smartphones could be used normally in swimming pools and at sea. The regulator also says the company hasn't even sufficiently tested how water affects its phones over their lifetime and has denied warranty claims from users of Galaxy smartphones that have been damaged by water.

      Samsung phones are not as water resistant as it claims, regulator claims

      Samsung commercial

      • The 5 best Samsung phones in 2022
      • OLED X QLED. Which technology is better?
      ACCC even analyzed more than 300 Samsung commercials to bring the company to justice. According to Reuters, if the Korean woman is convicted, each misleading commercial after September 2018, 7, would be charged a value of US$XNUMX million.

      The smartphones subject to the case are the Galaxy S10e, S10, S10 Plus, S9, S9 Plus, S8, S8 Plus, S7, S7 Edge, Note 9, Note 8, Note 7, A8, A7 and A5.


      The most ironic thing is that Samsung, on its Galaxy S10 smartphone page, says the phone is IP68 rated and "Not recommended for beach or pool use" and continues to make commercials that say otherwise.


      What do you, the reader, think of this? Comment below!

      add a comment of Samsung phones are not as water resistant as it claims, regulator claims
      Comment sent successfully! We will review it in the next few hours.

      End of content

      No more pages to load